A Secret Weapon For criminal law cases in malaysia
A Secret Weapon For criminal law cases in malaysia
Blog Article
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only performed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were nicely aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It can be well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed below have experienced opinions filed for them within the final 14 times. The following information is available for each case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, like signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the moment petition within the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner together with private respondents and will take care of many of the facets of the case and make sure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were told in the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had practically nothing to worry about.
Because of this, just citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help check here the party’s case. Visualize it as calling anyone to inform them you’ve found their dropped phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-this sort of neighborhood, without actually providing them an address. Driving throughout the community wanting to find their phone is probably going to be more frustrating than it’s really worth.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is effectively-settled that whilst considering the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to take into account the merit of the many suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who will be found to become most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored from the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part on the respondent department.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated earlier mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to either party as well as case shall be decided with the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
Any court may possibly seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there might be 1 or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason for that decision on the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted within an argument.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its first purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more